Jump to content

Talk:The Beatles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleThe Beatles is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 18, 2004, and on July 7, 2017.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 30, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
August 29, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
August 29, 2006Good article nomineeListed
February 5, 2007Good article reassessmentKept
April 26, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 9, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
November 16, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
June 3, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
September 26, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 3, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 26, 2009, and September 26, 2010.
Current status: Featured article


Missing: How Epstein's attention was drawn to the Beatles

[edit]

I wonder why this story is not told here, where a lad requested "My Bonnie by the Beatles" to Epstein in his NEMS record store? Was it just never mentioned yet, or was it mentioned but deleted because it was considered too anecdotal? The story is told in the wiki article: The Beatles in Hamburg J.Moondog (talk) 10:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if there are no objections, I will work on the addition of the aforementioned story. J.Moondog (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just realized that this missing section is oddly found complete in the article "The Beatles in Hamburg". I wrote in the "Talk" of that article that I was planning to move it from the Hamburg article to the main article, here, J.Moondog (talk) 05:58, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question to revisor @Tkbrett: why massive revert?

[edit]

Hi Tkbrett, Strange that all of a sudden, after close to a week, a massive revert was performed without explanation, with a vague reason that it was not readable enough? Can you explain? J.Moondog (talk) 03:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't strange at all; this is a Featured Article where the standard for writing is higher. Your edits introduced arbitrary paragraph and section breaks which made it less readable. In another case, you added an unsourced one-sentence paragraph. Tkbrett (✉) 15:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Make that Eight Grammys

[edit]

We can update that total to eight now that they picked up their latest for "Now and Then".

https://www.grammy.com/artists/beatles/16293 https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/03/entertainment/the-beatles-grammys-2025/index.html https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/grammys-2025-beatles-rolling-stones-win-b2691115.html https://www.theverge.com/news/604970/beatles-ai-restored-song-now-and-then-grammy-win 131.193.45.228 (talk) 22:21, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can we change the image

[edit]

Similar to other bands' Wikipedia images, the image of the Beatles should not be a square of combined images. Rather, it should be an image showing all of them together. Therefore, I propose an image of the Beatles in 1963, which is posed and shows all of them in their most iconic look. This image, aside from being a better image than the current, represents the Beatles in the way everyone remembers, similarly to the current. They are all smiling and looking at the camera too, so it does not look as awkward as the current. Thoughts? Wcamp9 (talk) 17:21, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm all for switching to the proposed image if the copyright concerns are cleared up. I also talk page messaged you on Commons as I can't find the image in the source link given. Miklogfeather (talk) 20:36, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This has been discussed briefly a few times before; see here, here, here, and here. The problem usually is a copyright issue, if you are able to prove that this image is PD it shouldn't be a problem to change it (though it may require an RfC). Yeshivish613 (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]